About the role of language in the formation of national unity

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/jpcp20259116
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In this article, the authors explore the complex relationship between language, nationalism and national unity. The authors draw attention to the socio-cultural nature of language, its integrative potential and impact on national identity. The authors systematize existing theoretical and methodological approaches, offering a new perspective on the dynamics of language and its role in strengthening national unity. The authors substantiate the role of language in shaping national identity, inclusiveness and argue that has an impact on mitigating social discord. Emphasizing effective language governance and institutional support, the authors draw attention to policies that promote social cohesion and stability, which allow for a broader understanding of the complex relationship between language and nationalism, as well as influence the strengthening of common values, the overcoming of barriers and promotion of inclusiveness, which ultimately helps to create a more stable and harmonious social environment. The scientific and practical significance of this work is that it can help specialists in this field understand the complexity of the role of language in social stability. Key words: language, national unity, nationalism, postcolonial theory, ambivalence, hybridity, mimicry.