Effectiveness evaluation of the implementation of state programs in state audit

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32523/2789-4320-2025-1-292-305
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The main purpose of the article is to study the assessment of the implementation of state programs as one of the functions of its activities of external state audit bodies and to identify further directions for their development. State programs ensure the implementation of long-term plans mainly because of its availability of the state treasury, which is a means of state economic management. Therefore, the application of these special state programs requires effective evaluation. Firstly, one of the crucial elements of efficiency evaluating of these state institutions is the comparison of indicators of efficiency and effectiveness of state programs, i.e. comparison of actual and planned results, definition of macroeconomic and microeconomic social effects. Among them, there is a high need to assess the accomplishing of the state program for the future development of highly productive employment, and mass entrepreneurship "Employment". Currently, it is required to provide methodological documentation and improve its methodology. With the help of a constructively built rating of program documents, we can identify various factors of annoyance or alteration from the planned indicators, while carrying out systematic actions related to the need to adjust the planned indicators of the state program.