Problems of unity of language and thinking in the process of terminological nomination

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32523/2616-678x-2025-150-1-22-34
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The main aspect of semiotic research in linguistics is the question of the connection between the three components: the sign, the signified (the subject of meaning), and the signifier (how meaning is made). The authors of the article consider the processes of representation of sign in the form of linguistic means through an alternative form of nomination. They conclude that the alternative nominations study requires a thorough method analysis of nominations. Modern trends in terminology are aimed at a comprehensive description of the terminological nomination processes. It is characterized by the predominance of some types of nomination over others, and the connection of certain types of nomination with various linguistic reality spheres. Establishing such specificity for a specific terminology system is a result of a terminology process study, inherent in this area of the nomination. The relevance of this issue became the basis for this article, in which the terminological nomination is based on a practical analysis of the term formation process. Considering the relevance of both semiotics from a modern linguistics point of view, they show that the nomination process is an indicator of the thought and language unity.