Abstract
This article analyzes the content of international acts and national legislation regarding the perception of the idea of justice in the norms regulating the administration of justice. The analysis of procedural legislation revealed differences in approaches to the legislative consolidation of the category of justice. In particular, the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan (hereinafter referred to as CiPC RK) does not exhibit a comprehensive perception of the category of justice. The article examines the concept and structure of the subjective right to a fair trial. Based on the results of the analysis, the author attempts to formulate proposals to improve certain provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure of the RK and the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan «On Enforcement Proceedings and the Status of Court Bailiffs».