CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR THE ILLEGAL USE OF TRADEMARKS: REGULATION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52026/2788-5291_2025_80_1_164
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The authors of the article consider the legal aspects of criminal liability for the illegal use of trademarks in the Republic of Kazakhstan, emphasizing the importance of their protection for the stable development of the economy and ensuring fair competition. The introduction of criminal liability and sanctions for trademark violations serves as an important tool for the protection of intellectual property, reducing the risk of financial losses to copyright holders and preventing the spread of counterfeit products. The authors provide historical and legal data, revealing the evolution of trademark legislation in Kazakhstan and abroad, starting with the first legislative acts in France and the United Kingdom and ending with modern standards. Special attention is paid to article 222 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, which establishes liability measures for the illegal use of a trademark. The study shows that law enforcement practice faces a number of difficulties, such as the rarity of cases involving trademark violations and difficulties in determining the economic damage caused by violators. Two approaches to calculating major damage are presented: for the loss of the copyright holder and for the cost of royalties, which emphasizes the need for an integrated approach to improve the effectiveness of intellectual property rights protection. Examples of court cases and statistical data demonstrate the importance of stricter criminal measures that contribute to the protection of trademark rights and provide a competitive advantage for legitimate owners. The authors conclude that it is important to clarify the criteria for determining damage, which can increase the legal certainty and effectiveness of protecting the rights of trademark owners in Kazakhstan.