Abstract
The global shift towards atypical labour, driven by digital technologies and evolving work patterns, reshapes employment across OECD countries. This article investigates the legal frameworks regulating atypical work, focusing on governments' approaches to balance flexibility and worker protection. Atypical employment, including temporary, freelance, remote, and seasonal work, presents opportunities and challenges, such as flexible work arrangements but less stability in social guarantees. The research utilizes analysis, synthesis, induction, and comparative legal analysis methods, drawing from international ratings, including the Global Innovation Index and World Competitiveness Ranking, to evaluate regulatory practices. By examining legislation from eight OECD countries—Germany, Denmark, the Netherlands, South Korea, the USA, Finland, Switzerland, and Sweden—the article identifies common trends in labour law adaptations to accommodate non-traditional employment. This study underscores the importance of international cooperation and the necessity of legal reforms in addressing the rise of atypical labour, as the current legal frameworks may not be sufficient to protect workers in this new landscape.