Theoretical and legal foundations of the formation of the legal definition of artificial intelligence: challenges and prospects

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31489/2025l1/68-79
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the theoretical and legal foundations of the formation of the legal defi-nition of artificial intelligence (AI) in the context of its rapid development and implementation in various spheres of public life. The study examines the existing problems associated with the lack of a unified legal definition of AI, as well as analyzes approaches to its regulation applied in various countries and international organizations, including the European Union and the United States. The research methods used were the analysis of regulatory legal acts, scientific publications, as well as comparative legal analysis. As a result of the study, it was revealed that the lack of a unified legal definition of AI creates significant legal difficulties that hinder effective regulation of this area. It has been established that approaches to the definition of AI and its regulation differ significantly in different jurisdictions, which leads to conflicts and legal uncertainty. The need to develop agreed international standards and definitions of AI, as well as mechanisms for allocating re-sponsibility for harm caused by AI, and personal data protection was emphasized. In conclusion, the im-portance of an integrated and interdisciplinary approach to the development of a legal system capable of ef-fectively regulating relations related to AI is emphasized.