Professional project of Russian notaries: from state control to self-autonomy and back

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/09695958.2025.2472624
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article focuses on the development of the Russian notary profession from the Soviet period to the present time. Although notaries currently possess almost all attributes of a mature legal profession, their professional autonomy is substantially restricted by the state. There are strong historical and cultural reasons for such a heavy dependency on the state. In the Soviet Union, notaries were an integral part of the state system. The transition to a market economy after Perestroika opened a window of opportunity for the full realisation of their professional project. Indeed, Russian notaries initially had made considerable progress in extending their jurisdiction and consolidating their profession. However, since the end of the 1990s, their professional project started to stagnate demonstrating a tendency of moving back from a liberal to a state-controlled profession. This article explores four key factors which contribute to this tendency. First, the shrinking of the notaries’ professional jurisdiction; second, the strengthening of state control over pricing policy applying to notarial services; third, the lack of consensus among notaries themselves on what model of the profession – autonomous or state-dependent – they need; and fourth, public perceptions, partly fuelled by media, about the incidence of nepotism and illegal practices among notaries .