Evaluation of the admissibility and reliability of an expert opinion in criminal proceedings

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.46914/2959-4197-2024-1-2-48-53
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article is devoted to the problem of assessing the admissibility and reliability of an expert’s opinion in the context of criminal proceedings. The expert’s opinion, as an important evidence in criminal cases, is an integral part of the judicial process. However, its admissibility and reliability play a crucial role in the formation of court decisions. The purpose of this study is to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the admissibility and reliability of the expert’s opinion in criminal proceedings. The article discusses the main aspects of assessing the admissibility of expert opinions, including the issues of expert qualification, his independence, methodology of work, as well as compliance with professional standards. The importance of strict procedure and supervision of experts to ensure the objectivity of conclusions is noted.