Abstract
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.• In the published article, there was an error in [Figure 8,9,10,11,12] as published.Information month "July" was missing. The corrected [8,9,10,11,12] and its caption The corrected sentence appears below:"[A systematic method was presented to develop a monthly PDF (probability density function) indicator using a rational function for parameters of interest such as temperature, humidity, and illuminance.The offices with window films always possessed 5 to 10% higher humidity compared with offices without windows films.The offices with window films always possessed lower temperatures between 2 degrees and 5 degrees Celsius compared with offices without window films.The lux intensity was reduced by applying window films particularly during the peak solar radiation of the day around 3 to 4 pm. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.End of template, if you would like to request a correction for a reason not seen here, please contact the journal's Editorial Office • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •