COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ENSEMBLE MODEL FOR STROKE CLASSIFICATION

2024

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51889/2959-5894.2024.88.4.018
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study investigates the efficacy of an ensemble model in classifying stroke images, combining CNN(Convolutional Neural Network), EfficientNetB7, and DenseNet201 architectures. Utilizing a dataset of 2,501 black-and-white images from the Kaggle stroke dataset, the research addresses the challenges posed by limited data and explores data augmentation techniques to improve model performance. The ensemble model’s performance is compared against individual models such as MobileNetV2, EfficientNetB0, ResNet50, and DenseNet201. Results demonstrate that, while the ensemble model shows potential, its accuracy does not significantly exceed that of the top-performing standalone models, highlighting the need for larger datasets and more sophisticated ensemble techniques to enhance reliability. This work provides insights into the application of ensemble learning for stroke classification, paving the way for advancements in AI-driven stroke diagnostics.