The impact of PPARγ and ApoE gene polymorphisms on susceptibility to diabetic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis

Binura Taurbekova, Kymbat Mukhtarova, Zhandos Salpynov, Kuralay K. Atageldiyeva, Antonio Sarría‐Santamera

2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1186/s12882-024-03859-6
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Globally, diabetic kidney disease (DKD) has become the leading cause of end-stage renal disease, imposing substantial social and economic costs. This meta-analysis was designed to provide valuable insights into gene-disease interactions by investigating the potential association between lipid metabolism gene polymorphisms and the risk of DKD. METHODS: An electronic literature search was conducted on MEDLINE Complete, Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed. A total of 18 studies on the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) Pro12Ala variant and 20 publications concerning apolipoprotein E (ApoE) gene polymorphism were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Overall, the PPARγ Pro12Ala polymorphism was found to be significantly associated with a decreased DKD risk (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62-0.88). In subgroup analysis, Ala carriers were less susceptible to DKD than Pro homozygotes among Asian (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56-0.95) and Caucasian populations (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.59-0.93). Subgroup analysis stratified by albuminuria categories showed that the PPARγ Pro12Ala polymorphism reduced the risk of both microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria with corresponding ORs of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.43-0.78) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.53-0.86). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the meta-analysis results. However, publication bias was identified in the subgroup analysis of the Caucasian population. The primary analysis of the ApoE gene polymorphism yielded significant findings, indicating that ApoE ε2/ε2, ApoE ε2/ε3, and ApoE ε2/ε4 genotypes increase the risk of DKD (ε2/ε2 vs. ε3/ε3: OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.03-3.61; ε2/ε3 vs. ε3/ε3: OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.19-2.25; ε2/ε4 vs. ε3/ε3: OR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.37-2.55). However, sensitivity analysis suggested that influential and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE)-violating studies may impact the overall effect estimates. CONCLUSIONS: A meta-analysis showed that PPARγ gene polymorphism may be a protective factor for DKD, whereas the ApoE ε2/ε2, ApoE ε2/ε3, and ApoE ε2/ε4 genotypes are associated with an increased risk of DKD. However, the role of ApoE gene polymorphism in susceptibility to DKD is less certain and requires further evaluation.