STUDIES THE CRUCIAL ROLE OF SELECTION OF EXTRACTANT TO EXTRACT NIOBIUM FROM SULFURYL FLUORIDE SOLUTION AND OPTIMIZATION OF EXTRACTION CONDITIONS

2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.36547/ams.30.3.2060
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The increasing demand for rare refractory metals such as niobium in high-tech industries requires the development of efficient and sustainable methods to extract them from secondary sources, including industrial by-products. This study studied niobium extraction from a fluoride-sulfuric acid solution obtained by leaching a niobium-containing intermediate product. A comprehensive assessment of various organic extractants, including methyl isobutyl ketone, tributyl phosphate, trioctylamine, and Cyanex 923, was performed, focusing on the recoverability of niobium from this solution. Experimental results show that Cyanex 923 is significantly superior to other extractants in efficacy. The extraction of niobium at different concentrations of this extractant in toluene and the ratios of organic and aqueous phases were studied. It is established that an increase in the contact time of the phases does not contribute to additional niobium recovery. Studies show that applying concentrated Cyanex 923 in toluene ensures complete recovery of niobium into the organic phase. The three-stage counter-current extraction shows a slightly higher niobium recovery efficiency than the single-stage process.