English-medium education in Kazakhstan: A multifaceted exploration of student and alumni perceptions on language proficiency, academic performance, and career prospects

2024

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102451
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

• Students and alumni have positive views of opportunities through studies in English. • Positive views are connected to opportunities for international content and teaching methods. • Students’ negative views of academic performance in English are associated with their higher L1 proficiency. English-medium education (EME) has become a global trend, especially in bilingual and multilingual university contexts, aiming to enhance students' English proficiency and their readiness for an internationalized workforce. While EMEʼs potential benefits and challenges to English language development have been explored, its impact on content knowledge acquisition and employment prospects remains debated. This study investigates the interplay of English linguistic proficiency, academic performance, and workplace opportunities in a single EME university in Kazakhstan, a bilingual context typically with Kazakh and Russian as dominant instructional languages. This mixed-methods study, adapted from a case study of a Chinese university (Huang & Curle, 2021), surveyed students ( n = 61) and alumni ( n = 48) who evaluated their development in EME and their experiences in hypothetical comparison with Kazakh or Russian as a language of instruction. Ten students and seven alumni were interviewed to contextualize survey responses. Results showed strong beliefs in EME's advantages for proficiency, content knowledge, and employment, with correlations observed between these beliefs and English or Kazakh proficiency levels. These insights underscore the need for pedagogical strategies tailored to the diverse needs of EME students.