The Model of the Professional Linguistic Personality of a Lawyer of Kazakhstan in the Linguistic Rhetorical Ideal Aspect

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.30564/fls.v7i1.7953
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article presents the results of a study on the professional linguistic personality of a specialist in the legal industry of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the linguistic rhetorical Ideal aspect in the concept of the Sochi Linguistic & Rhetorical School. An idealized linguistic rhetorical model of the professional linguistic personality of a Kazakhstani lawyer has been created, in which the most significant personal, professional, and speech-thinking qualities of the ‘ideal specialist’ are collected and systemized. Modeling was performed in stages. First, the professional linguistic personality structure of a lawyer is analyzed at four levels: verbal-semantic, linguistic-cognitive, motivational and situational-synthesizing. The verbal and non-verbal means forming each structural level are revealed. Second, the professional competence of a Kazakhstani lawyer is considered and its key professional competencies are determined. The necessity for a lawyer to form and develop an integral linguistic rhetorical competence, combining language, linguistic, rhetorical competencies, which, in turn, integrates textual, communicative and ethno-cultural-speech competencies, is justified. Third, the dominants of the linguistic rhetorical Ideal of speech actions are described, which are Logos, Ethos, Pathos, and Sophia. A generalized scheme is provided upon completion of the modeling of the lawyer's professional linguistic personality. It is concluded that Kazakhstani lawyers, who are most consistent with the linguistic rhetorical model developed in this article, collectively embody the image of an ‘ideal specialist of the legal industry in Kazakhstan’.