Abstract
Central Asia has increasingly become a focal point for both the European Union (EU) and the United States (US),each pursuing distinct yet overlapping objectives. This article presents a comparative analysis of the EU's and the US's economic engagement in Central Asia,with a particular focus on trade relations, foreign investments, and energy security. By examining key development projects such as the Trans-Caspian Corridor, the study evaluates the effectiveness, scope, and sustainability of their economic interactionsin the region. The analysis highlights both convergences anddivergences in their strategies, revealing how these engagements shape regional stability, economic growth, and political reforms. While both the EU and the US share theoverarching goal of fostering stability and development in Central Asia, their priorities and methodsdiffer. The EU’s approach, grounded in liberal internationalism, emphasizes soft power tools, including economic cooperation, infrastructure development,and democracy promotion through institutional support. On the other hand, the US follows a more realist approach, focusingon geopolitical competition, securing energy routes, and enhancing militarycooperation, particularly through frameworks like the C5+1 platform. This comparative study sheds light on the broader geopolitical implications of Western involvement in Central Asia and its long-term impact on the region’s evolving political and economic landscape.