Audio description as a type of intersemiotic translation

2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32523/2616-678x-2024-149-4-217-223
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

With the adoption of a law obliging film producers to supply films receiving state support with audio description, the issue of training specialists in this field arose. However, the existing terminological barrier between the Russian and international practice of audio description (typho commentary) in many ways complicates the exchange of experience between specialists. The article briefly discusses the stages of the development of audio description and the terms that were used to denote the process of verbal description of audiovisual works. The analysis of audio description as a type of intersemiotic translation is given. The evolution of the Russian term “typho commentary” and its convergence with international analogues is shown.