Determination of the Optimal Number of Topics in the LDA Model When Working with Large Arrays of Text Data

2023

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/sist58284.2023.10223563
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article presents the issues of thematic modeling. The existing approaches for determining the optimal number of topics when working with text data are considered. Calculated metrics such as coherence score, perplexity. There are many widely used methods for determining topics when working with text data. But most of the methods are developed based on the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA). One of the main disadvantages of the probabilistic LDA model is the parameter$\theta$, which the researcher must determine in advance, which is often impossible to know a priori. One of the main adopted strategies is the calculation of a series of LDA models with a different number of topics in a certain quantitative range, followed by the calculation of the quality metrics of the resulting topics.