An Ontological Model for Structuring Rules and Conditions in Campaign Debates

2024

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/piere62470.2024.10804958
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The rapid advancement of information technologies and the growing scope of their application necessitate the development of systems capable of efficiently processing and analyzing text in natural language. To achieve this, it is essential to create a robust knowledge base specific to a given subject area. This research paper addresses the issue of ontological modeling for defining the rules and conditions governing pre-election debates. Pre-election debates serve as a critical tool in democratic processes, enabling candidates to present their work programs and positions comprehensively to the public. Effective debate management helps ensure informed voting decisions. In the context of computational linguistics, the outcomes of this study can be applied in various domains, such as electronic thesauri, multimedia question-and-answer systems, intelligent learning environments, particularly in the Kazakh language. The proposed ontological model could further enhance automated systems' understanding and processing of political discourse, providing significant contributions to the analysis of natural language in the political domain.