Hexavalent chromium at the crossroads of science, environment and public health

RSC Advances, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1039/d5ra03104d
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

toxic Cr(vi) paradigm, suggesting all chromium forms may pose health risks under certain conditions. Critical assessment of current remediation technologies demonstrates that while laboratory studies consistently report high removal efficiencies, these approaches fail to address the vast scale of existing environmental contamination. Most critically, conventional methods focus on transferring chromium between phases rather than implementing circular economy principles that enable recovery and reuse of this valuable element. The review concludes that to address the chromium crisis, it is necessary to move beyond conventional wastewater treatment and adopt prevention-focused strategies that emphasize circular economy principles. Future solutions must prioritize contamination prevention, closed-loop industrial systems, and long-term management rather than pursuit of complete remediation. Only through such realistic assessment and integrated action can we hope to minimize the ongoing impacts of this persistent environmental challenge.