Answers to five questions posed by Shakarim from Molavi’s worldview

2024

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.17223/19986645/89/13
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article is written in a comparative literature context in addressing questions by Shakarim (1858–1931), the mystic poet of Kazakh nation, as he forwarded on anthropology and self-knowledge, and answering them from Molavi’s viewpoint. The article studies and compares the philosophical worldviews in Molavi’s and Shakarim’s poems. Although the two poets lived in two different ages and a period of six centuries parts them and their views on anthropology and self-knowledge. Both Molavi and Shakarim attributed to allegory in expressing their self-knowledge subjects and in some occasions, scientific and social issues. There are many similarities between the thoughts and philosophical view in perceiving the world expressed by Molavi and Shakarim on “man” and “self-knowledge”. As an example, both poets expressed the concept “self” by using various metaphors. In addition, they attributed to allegories and similes in times to explain the topic.