The ‘Great Steppe’ narrative: origins, politics and aspirations of Eternal Kazakhstan

2024

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/02634937.2024.2427646
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Manifestations of the Steppe in Kazakhstan’s public domains have become more frequent including depictions of the Steppe on billboards, and government campaigns featuring ‘Nur-Sultan – the heart of the Great Steppe’. These kinds of expressions are not solely based on historical facts, but they emphasize, isolate and interpret the ancient past in a multitude of volatile ways. The Eurasian Steppe is being increasingly portrayed with the epithet ‘Great ’ – as the ‘Great Steppe’, and the Kazakhstani establishment is seeking to take ownership of that Steppe. Purposefully ambiguous, the Great Steppe narrative experiences internal contradictions as well as external. Kazakhstani officials are trying to claim everything that happened and everyone who lived in the Steppe for the history of modern Kazakhstan. This article is meant to identify how the Steppe changed and was changed in the Imperial, Soviet political imaginings, and how it became the form and content of the new Kazakhstani identity. This is a discourse-based analysis of the term ‘Great Steppe’, which was consistently used by the First President of the Republic.