Bibliometric Review of Osteochondral Interface Regeneration

Sanazar Kadyr, Bakhytbol Khumyrzakh, Cevat Erişken

2024

Full text Open access: Green Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.20944/preprints202411.2287.v1
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The topic of OC interface (OCI) has shown an increasing interest in recent years, with a considerable increase in the number of publications. Here, the aim was to reveal trend in OCI research studies and analyze the publications with high citations. An online search was performed on the Web of Science Core Collection (WSCC) for publications on OCI. The journals, publication year, countries, institutions, and citations received were obtained, and the results were analyzed using VOSviewer. Only the most frequently cited top 100 publications on OCI were further considered. Totally, 225 publications were found related to OCI. The number of publications on OCI has increased with time. The US has published the most articles on OCI (n=61). The University of Minho (Portugal) was the most productive institution, with 8 publications and 753 citations. The number of publications on OC interface has recently increased. This study is the first bibliometric study evaluating publications on the OC interface and serves as a valuable source for researchers and practitioners actively working in the field.