Trust in the Mass Media and Media Landscape of Kazakhstan

2024

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1163/15691330-bja10118
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract This study examines mass media as an intermediary between individuals and public institutions. The goals are to determine why people trust and distrust mass media and predict their outcomes. Analysis, synthesis, historical analysis, classification and typologization of system analysis, generalization, and comparison were used to complete the study and complete the tasks. The study examines media influence under the assumption that free media promotes healthy democracy in a changing society. Media activity is focused on audience socio-political engagement. A rise in information flow, and most importantly, a lack of critical understanding and filtering by the audience, can harm the opposition, which is a sign of democratic weakness.