Occupational burnout in women schoolteachers in Kazakhstan: psychometric evaluation and psychosocial correlates within the job demands-resources framework

Frontiers in Psychology, 2026

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1945234
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

Background Teaching combines intense interpersonal demands with administrative and digital workload, and in Kazakhstan more than four fifths of schoolteachers are women, which makes burnout in this group a gender-relevant occupational health and wellbeing concern. Evidence from Central Asia remains scarce, and the performance of the Russian-language Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (MBI-ES) in this population had not been formally examined. Methods In a cross-sectional study conducted between October and December 2025, 323 women teachers recruited by convenience in general education schools in three Kazakhstani cities completed the MBI-ES, the state scale of the Spielberger State–Trait Anxiety Inventory, and a structured questionnaire covering employment, workload, social-psychological, lifestyle, and digital factors. We split the sample at random, examined the structure in one half and confirmed it in the other, compared the three-factor model against one-factor, two-factor, and bifactor alternatives, tested measurement invariance, and fitted hierarchical regression models built on the job demands-resources framework. Results The correlated three-factor model outperformed one-factor and two-factor alternatives and fitted the validation subsample well ( χ 2 /df = 1.69; CFI = 0.955; RMSEA = 0.065; SRMR = 0.080). A bifactor model fitted better on global indices but yielded a degenerate exhaustion-specific factor and negative general loadings for accomplishment items, so we retained three factors. Loadings and intercepts were invariant across the random halves; across cities loadings held but intercepts did not. Subscale reliability was high (α 0.918 to 0.963). Job demands added 35.1% of explained variance in emotional exhaustion beyond background characteristics, resources a further 6.6%; perceived work stress, state anxiety, and low physical activity remained independent correlates in the full model (adjusted R 2 = 0.630). Depersonalization was associated with conflict, work stress, isolation, and an unfavorable collegial climate (adjusted R 2 = 0.443), and personal accomplishment gave the weakest model (adjusted R 2 = 0.170). Demographic and formal workload characteristics contributed little. Conclusion The Russian-language MBI-ES performs acceptably in women schoolteachers in Kazakhstan. In this convenience sample, burnout was associated more closely with appraised psychosocial working conditions than with formal job parameters. The cross-sectional design supports no causal inference, and the findings apply to women teachers in three urban settings.