Legal regulation and liability for online fraud based on the use of deepfake technologies and social engineering: foreign experience and directions for its adoption

2026

Закрытый доступ Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31489/2026l2/147-157
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

In the context of the rapid development of digital technologies, online fraud based on the use of deepfake technologies and social engineering methods poses a significant threat to public safety. The aim of this study is to analyse the legal regulation and liability measures for such crimes in foreign countries, as well as to identify areas where positive international experience can be used to improve national legislation. The study employs general scientific and special methods of cognition, including analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction, as well as formal-legal, comparative-legal and systemic-structural methods. The work examines normative legal acts, judicial practice and doctrinal approaches in a number of foreign countries, including the European Union, the United States and Asian countries, regulating liability for digital forms of fraud. As a result, the main models of legal response to crimes involving deepfakes and social engineering were identified, and their strengths and weaknesses were established. The study concludes that a comprehensive approach to legal regulation is necessary, including clarifying the elements of offences, strengthening preventive measures, and developing international cooperation. The results obtained can be used to formulate proposals for improving criminal and information legislation.