Augmented reality for practice-oriented learning in dual education: a Kazakhstan case

Frontiers in Education, 2026

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/feduc.2026.1787753
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

This study is aimed at identifying the scientific and pedagogical foundations of the integration of augmented reality, AR technologies into the system of dual vocational education and assessing their impact on the production practical and professional competencies of students. The results of a systematic analysis showed that AR technologies are an effective tool for combining theory and practice, increasing the interactivity of the educational process and forming production skills in a safe environment. Within the setting of digital transformation in the education system in Kazakhstan, it is urgent to reduce the gap between theoretical knowledge and industrial practice in dual education. From this point of view, the use of AR technologies is considered as a new pedagogical approach. The aim of the study is to develop students’ competencies through the use of AR technologies in the framework of dual educational programs and to empirically evaluate its pedagogical effectiveness. The study was conducted on the basis of two organizations of technical and vocational education using a quasi-experimental method for three academic years (2023–2024, 2024–2025, 2025–2026). The experimental group used the E-dual platform.kz with AR modules, traditional training was used in the control group. The total sample consisted of N = 410 students ( E G = 205 , C G = 205 ). In the study, the proportion of low-performing students in both groups in all three academic years decreased by 5–7 percentage points. If in the 2025–2026 academic year the average score of the experimental group for the formative experiment was M = 63.22 , then in the determining period the indicator was M = 60.98 . In the control group, these indicators were M = 60.52 and M = 58.78 , respectively. The growth of the experimental group was statistically higher than that of the control group ( t = 1.717 , d f = 49 , d = 0.188 ), while the growth value remained lower in the control group i.e., ( t = 1.181 , d f = 49 , d = 0.129 ). Both effective measurement values obtained on the Cohen scale refer to small impact levels.