The Issue of Preventing Religious Extremism in Kazakhstan

2026

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.64753/jcasc.v11i1.4125
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

This article offers a comprehensive theoretical and practical analysis of the prevention of religious extremism in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The study aims to provide a systematic review of state policies and domestic scholarly efforts intended to strengthen preventive measures against religious extremism. Methodologically, the research draws on the principle of systemic inquiry and employs textual analysis alongside comparative analysis. The findings indicate that Kazakhstan has approached the threat of religious extremism at the strategic level and has implemented a set of integrated measures—legal, socio-cultural, and ideological—designed to reduce vulnerability and mitigate risks. The study also demonstrates that the phenomenon of religious extremism and the mechanisms of its prevention have been actively examined within Kazakhstani philosophy, religious studies, and the social sciences. However, persistent divergences in academic perspectives and enduring gaps between theoretical approaches suggest the absence of a fully consolidated analytical framework. Against this background, the article substantiates the need to distinguish clearly between strategic (long-term, structural) and tactical (operational, applied) levels of prevention, arguing that such differentiation is essential for improving both conceptual clarity and policy effectiveness. The results may contribute to further theoretical research on religious extremism and can be used in the teaching of philosophy, religious studies, sociology, and psychology. The main scholarly contribution of the study lies in its systematic mapping of existing approaches to the prevention of religious extremism in Kazakhstan and in its conceptual proposal to differentiate prevention strategies from tactical interventions.