Coexistence of horizontal bone loss and dehiscence with the bundle and conventional fiber post: a finite element analysis

2024

Закрытый доступ Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/10255842.2024.2423266
Достоверность данных 85 высокая
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

Horizontal bone loss (HBL) and dehiscence are common supportive tissue defects. This study evaluated the stress distribution in the presence of HBL or dehiscence and two types of fiber posts. Twelve premolars that were endodontically treated (Model-E), restored with conventional (Model-C), and bundle (Model-B) post were modeled. Bone defects were created as control (Model-1), with 4 mm (Model-4) and 8 mm (Model-8) HBL, and dehiscence involving two-thirds of the root (Model-D). HBL was included in all aspects of the models, while dehiscence was confined to the buccal aspect. The models were subjected to a 200 N force, and von Mises stress was analyzed. Model-B1 showed higher stress than Model-C1 but was more homogeneous. In Model-D, the stress was limited to the area without bone and only occurred at the buccal aspect. The highest stress was observed in Model-B8. The presence of a post caused a 2-5.8 times increase in stress. When the crown-root ratio was 1:0.8, stress was in the coronal two-thirds of the root, while at a ratio of 1:0.3, stress was distributed throughout the entire root. Bundle post with 8 mm HBL increased the stress 5.8 times. HBL resulted in stress extending beyond the marginal bone, while dehiscence did not.