Advancing gambogic acid for translational oncology: Redox–proteostasis collapse, multidrug resistance reversal, nanodelivery and biomarker‐guided development

2026

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1002/ctd2.70188
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

Abstract Background Gambogic acid (GA), a caged xanthone derived primarily from Garcinia hanburyi , has shown broad anticancer activity across multiple preclinical tumour models. This narrative review critically evaluates the molecular mechanisms, pharmacokinetics, multidrug resistance‐modulating effects, delivery strategies and translational barriers relevant to GA development in oncology. Methods PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for peer‐reviewed studies addressing GA‐related anticancer activity, redox regulation, proteostasis, pharmacokinetics, formulation, combination therapy and clinical translation. Results Available evidence indicates that GA promotes reactive oxygen species accumulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis, autophagy modulation and proteostasis disruption while suppressing nuclear factor kappa B, phosphatidylinositol‐3‐kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin, mitogen‐activated protein kinase, and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signalling. GA may also reverse multidrug resistance by inhibiting drug‐efflux transporters and sensitising tumour cells to conventional anticancer agents. However, translation remains limited by poor aqueous solubility, extremely low oral bioavailability, rapid systemic clearance, incomplete human pharmacokinetic characterisation, uncertain tumour‐selective exposure and potential off‐target toxicity. Nanoformulations, prodrugs and carrier‐based systems improve solubility and systemic exposure in preclinical models, but comparative data on biodistribution, long‐term safety, scalability and regulatory feasibility remain insufficient. Conclusion Current evidence therefore supports GA more strongly as an exposure‐optimised, biomarker‐guided chemosensitising adjuvant than as a standalone cytotoxic agent. Future development should prioritise genetic target validation, human pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic studies, tumour‐exposure measurements, standardised safety assessment, scalable delivery platforms and biomarker‐guided early‐phase trials.