Method for Optimizing the Parameters of Mechanical Processing of Holes to Ensure Cutting Tool Stability and Cost-Effective Machining

2025

Закрытый доступ Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52209/2706-977x_2025_3_84
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

This article describes a new approach to optimizing the parameters of mechanical hole machining, which solves the problem of compromise between various criteria, such as machining time, tool durability, and surface quality. Traditional optimization methods, as shown in the study, usually focus on a single parameter, which inevitably leads to deterioration in others. For example, increasing the cutting speed to reduce machining time causes rapid tool wear, while reducing parameters to improve surface quality significantly increases time and production costs. To overcome these shortcomings, a methodology based on weighted multi-criteria analysis was developed. The methodology includes several stages: data collection, formation of objective functions, definition of constraints, normalization of criteria, and selection of an optimization method. A key element is the use of weighting coefficients, which allow the methodology to be adapted to specific production priorities. The study was conducted using a specific example of optimizing hole drilling in 45 steel. Weighting coefficients were set, with the greatest weight given to processing time (0.5), followed by roughness (0.3) and tool resistance (0.2). As a result, the following parameters were recognized as optimal: cutting speed vc = 22 m/min and feed fz = 0.2 mm/rev. With these values, the processing time was reduced from 37.9 to 28.7 seconds, while tool durability decreased from 275.2 to 176.4 μm. This clearly demonstrates that the method has found a compromise solution that allows reducing the time without critically compromising tool durability