COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT METHODS OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN AND OTHER COUNTRIES

2024

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.22598/iele.2024.11.1.5
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

The relevance of the study is determined by the need to modernize and improve the legal framework of Kazakhstan with the variable state of the economic, political, and social system, one of the components of which is the process of public procurement.The study aims to conduct a comparative legal analysis of the implementation of public procurement in Kazakhstan and other countries.Such methodological approaches as the theoretical approach, functional approach, method of legal hermeneutics, method of logical analysis, method of deduction, and others were used in the work.During the research, it was revealed that the digitalization of processes in the field of public procurement provides an opportunity to optimize the logistics information flows and to rationalize the full implementation mechanism of procurement for the needs of the state.A comparative analysis of the implementation of public procurement in Kazakhstan and such countries as Germany, China, South Korea, the United States of America, and Ukraine was conducted.The study of best practices allowed identifying a range of recommendations that will help to improve the effectiveness of the current mechanism of public procurement in Kazakhstan.The normative legal acts, which regulate the activities on implementation of public procurement in Kazakhstan, were analyzed in detail, which, in turn, allowed us to characterize this mechanism with the inclusion of theoretical and practical aspects.The study also revealed that there is no single universal model of public procurement in modern international practice; this is because each state system has peculiarities of socio-economic, legal, and political nature.The practical value of the results is to provide recommendations for improving the current mechanism of public procurement in Kazakhstan.