From institutional strategies to relational wellbeing: how implementation quality shapes psychological safety in schools

2026

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/feduc.2026.1799502
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

Research on school wellbeing has increasingly emphasised the role of institutional strategies, yet limited attention has been given to how these strategies are translated into everyday experiences within schools. This study addresses this gap by examining how wellbeing is produced through the interaction of institutional arrangements, implementation processes, and relational dynamics. Drawing on qualitative interviews with school leaders, teachers, and psychologists across diverse school contexts in Kazakhstan, the study adopts an ecological and relational perspective to analyse how wellbeing emerges in practice. The findings show that institutionalised wellbeing strategies, such as psychological support services, inclusive education practices, and anti-bullying systems, provide an important structural foundation, but do not, in themselves, ensure psychologically safe environments. Instead, implementation quality through staffing capacity, role clarity, leadership coordination, and resource mobilisation operates as a critical mechanism shaping how these strategies are enacted. Psychological safety emerges as the proximal relational condition through which implementation processes are experienced, enabling trust, help-seeking, and emotional expression. In turn, relational wellbeing between teachers and students is shown to be an interdependent and dynamically negotiated process, rather than a stable individual outcome. Family environments further act as contextual boundary conditions that enable or constrain school-based wellbeing efforts. By integrating ecological systems theory with psychological safety and relational perspectives, the study reframes school wellbeing as an ecologically embedded, relational–institutional process mediated by implementation quality. This provides a process-based explanation for variation in wellbeing outcomes across schools and contributes to broader debates on how institutional strategies are translated into lived experience in educational and organisational settings.