Shadow education in rural Kazakhstan: patterns and implications for access to higher education

2026

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Green Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/02671522.2026.2657816
Достоверность данных 85 высокая
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

This mixed-methods study investigates fee-based private tutoring, known as shadow education, among Grade 11 students in rural Kazakhstan, focusing on participation patterns, perceived effectiveness, and implications for equitable access to higher education. Guided by Bronfenbrenner’s (1994) ecological systems theory, the study employs a convergent design integrating quantitative survey data from 740 students with qualitative insights from eight semi-structured group interviews, each conducted with six students from a different school. Findings reveal that 41.35% of students engaged in fee-based tutoring despite economic constraints, primarily to prepare for the Unified National Testing (UNT). Small-group, face-to-face tutoring predominated, although online tutoring was increasingly used to overcome geographical barriers. Regression analyses show that perceived effectiveness varied by gender, tutoring format, and family support, with female students reporting higher academic confidence and exam readiness. However, tutoring was also associated with financial strain and emotional stress for students from lower-income households, raising concerns about educational equity and well-being. The study underscores the need for regulatory frameworks to ensure quality and protect students and targeted state-supported tutoring initiatives to bridge rural-urban divides. Findings contribute to global debates on shadow education and call for further research into its long-term psychological and structural implications in under-resourced contexts.0