Analyzing CLIL Studies in Primary Education: Bibliometric analysis

2025

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.48161/qaj.v4n4a1410
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) holds a pivotal role in fostering English vocabulary acquisition among primary school students across various subjects. This study aims to undertake a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of English research articles spanning the past 16 years (2007-2023), focusing on CLIL implementation within primary education. Employing Boolean operators and wildcard symbols, we amalgamated pertinent keywords for querying the Scopus database. To facilitate bibliometric assessments, the Bibliometrix package within RStudio, in conjunction with Biblioshiny web applications, was harnessed. Our analysis encompassed tracking publication and citation patterns, identification of highly cited documents, assessment of prolific authors, nations, and universities, and recognition of influential journals. A dataset comprising 138 research articles was curated. Our investigation unveiled a consistent upward trajectory in both publication frequency and citation counts over the study's 16-year timeframe. Notably, the work by Fernandez-Sanjurio in 2019 emerged as the most cited paper. Foremost authors included Madrid D and Martinez Agudo JD, while the 'International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism' emerged as a leading publication venue. Among contributing institutions, the University of Cordoba and University of Granada featured prominently. The most prolific countries were Spain, China, and Australia, with notable collaboration occurring between Spain, China, and the United Kingdom. This study underscores the significant contributions of Spain in terms of authors, institutions, and citations, solidifying its role as a key contributor to the realm of CLIL research within primary education.