EVALUATING A MOBILE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ ENVIRONMENTAL COMPETENCIES: A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

Scientific Journal of Astana IT University, 2026

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.37943/mrcc6435
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

The integration of digital technologies into environmental education creates opportunities to link theoretical knowledge with practical activities and environmentally responsible behavior. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the Green IQ mobile app as a supplementary educational tool for fostering environmental competencies among students and to determine whether its integration into traditional environmental education is associated with an increase in students’ environmental competencies. The study involved a quantitative quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test analysis in a control group. Sixty first-year students participated in the study. Participants were divided into an experimental group (n = 29) and a control group (n = 31). Both groups received comparable environmental education through lectures, training sessions, and practical assignments, while the experimental group additionally used the Green IQ mobile app. The Eco Index was assessed using a 10-item instrument developed by the author on a five-point Likert scale, covering environmental awareness, attitudes toward the environment, and environmentally responsible behavior. The results of the study showed that the mean Eco Index for the entire sample increased from 2.53 (SD = 0.769) on the pre-test to 4.03 (SD = 0.727) on the post-test. Both groups demonstrated significant within-group improvement: in the experimental group, it increased from 2.55 to 4.43 (mean change = 1.88), t (28) = 13.10, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 2.42, while in the control group it increased from 2.52 to 3.65 (mean change = 1.13), t(30) = 5.35, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.960. A mixed-effects analysis of variance revealed a significant time-by-group interaction, F(1,58) = 8.39, p = 0.005, indicating greater improvement in the experimental group.