Vertical Gender Segregation in Managerial Employment in Kazakhstan

2026

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Hybrid Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47703/ejgs.v3i3.140
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

Vertical gender segregation remains an important dimension of labour market inequality, reflecting differences in women's and men's representation across occupational hierarchies and access to managerial positions. This study assesses vertical gender segregation in managerial employment in Kazakhstan and identifies potential barriers to women’s career advancement. The empirical analysis draws on official statistics from the Bureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan on women's representation among managers in 2019–2024, data on the gender composition of the civil service as of January 1, 2025, and gender-disaggregated wage indicators for 2021–2025. The methodology combines descriptive statistical analysis, comparative assessment of gender representation, calculation of structural disparities, and synthesis of academic literature on career advancement. The findings indicate that women's representation among managers across all sectors declined from 43.0% in 2019 to 41.3% in 2024, despite a partial recovery after 2021. In the civil service, women accounted for 55.82% of total employment but only 39.10% of managerial positions, compared with 62.43% among non-managerial employees. These differences provide evidence of vertical gender segregation but do not independently establish the existence of a glass ceiling. The literature identifies professional specialisation, family responsibility, organisational practices, leadership evaluation, and access to career development opportunities as potential barriers that require further empirical investigation. The study contributes to understanding structural gender disparities in managerial employment and highlights the need for disaggregated longitudinal personnel data to assess inequalities in career progression and promotion.