Reflective Culture and Digital Competence inPre-Service Teacher Development: TheMediating Role of Instructional Smart SelfEfficacy

2026

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.5815/ijmecs.2026.05.06
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

Teacher education requires models that connect reflective practice and digital competence with thepsychological processes through which professional growth occurs. This longitudinal pre-test/post-test quasiexperiment examined whether a composite reflective-digital practice process predicted professional development andwhether instructional smart self-efficacy mediated this association. The sample comprised 120 third-year pre-serviceteachers enrolled in a Computer Science Pedagogy program (N = 120) who completed a 15-week interventionorganized across four instructional conditions. Data were collected with an expert-reviewed 19-item questionnaire usinga five-point Likert scale. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling were used to assess themeasurement and structural models, and indirect effects were evaluated with 5,000 bias-corrected bootstrap resamples.Internal consistency was satisfactory across the four constructs (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86-0.91). Reflective-digitalpractice was positively associated with professional outcomes (beta = 0.41, p < 0.001), whereas its path to instructionalsmart self-efficacy (beta = 0.12, p = 0.184) and the direct path from self-efficacy to professional outcomes (beta = 0.10,p = 0.211) were not significant. The bootstrapped indirect estimate was significant (B = 0.09, 95% CI [0.02, 0.17], p =0.018), and the model explained 54% of the variance in professional outcomes (R² = 0.54). These findings providepreliminary empirical support for a mediated reflective-digital pathway, while the single-program sample and relianceon self-reports limit causal and population-level inference.