ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DIGITAL CRIMINALITY: OUTLINES OF A TECHNOETIC APPROACH

2026

Закрытый доступ Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.70239/arsu.2026.t85.n3.50
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

This article is devoted to the study of the phenomenon of digital criminology - an emerging field of scholarship that examines the potential for artificial intelligence (AI) to be used by offenders, including the category of offences conventionally referred to as AI-crime. The object of the study is crime, victimization, and justice under the conditions of digital society, where the boundaries between online and offline reality are increasingly blurred; the subject of the study is the risks and ethical dimensions of employing AI for criminal purposes. The aim of the work is to define the contours of digital criminology on the basis of an interdisciplinary, techno-social approach that integrates criminology, philosophy of technology, and cyberlaw. The methodological foundation of the study comprises comparative-legal, systemic, and structural-functional analysis, along with elements of predictive modeling. The article examines such manifestations of digital crime as automated cyberattacks, deepfake generation, algorithmic fraud, and the manipulation of user behavior through recommendation systems. It is shown that the emerging field of techno-ethics has yet to develop stable criteria for assessing deviant online behavior, and that existing legal mechanisms insufficiently account for the specific nature of algorithmic and autonomous forms of unlawful activity, including the problem of attributing responsibility where autonomous systems are involved. Particular attention is given to issues surrounding the legal classification of acts committed with the use of generative models, as well as gaps in the evidentiary basis for digital crimes. The article substantiates the need to improve criminal legislation, to develop specialized educational programs, and to train personnel capable of countering cybercrime in a «hybrid» world, where the line between human and machine agency is becoming increasingly indistinct, and where traditional models of guilt and intent require reconsideration.