UAV-based automated monitoring of personal protective equipment compliance on construction sites: a field performance evaluation

2026

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.54355/tbus/27897338.6.3.2026.0110
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

Ensuring compliance with personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements remains one of the most persistent challenges in construction site safety management, and conventional manual inspection struggles to provide continuous, site-wide coverage. This study evaluates the field performance of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based monitoring system that combines drone imagery with computer vision to automatically verify PPE compliance among construction workers. The object of the study is construction-related PPE, and the subject of the study is the effectiveness of its detection by computer vision using a UAV camera. The system developed by the authors was tested using a DJI Matrice 4E UAV (Da-Jiang Innovations Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) at an active construction site. Based on the resulting video recordings, a dataset of more than 500 high-resolution images was compiled and manually annotated to support training and evaluation. Field performance was assessed across four scenarios monitoring four to seven PPE items simultaneously, using the percentage of matches against manually annotated reference images, descriptive statistics, and trend analysis, and the results were discussed against comparable field and benchmark studies. The average number of correctly detected objects ranged from 3.75 to 5.75 across the four scenarios, corresponding to a relative detection rate of 82.1% to 93.8% of each scenario's maximum, with a coefficient of variation not exceeding 17.8%, supporting the system's potential as a continuous, site-wide complement to manual safety inspection.