Professional identity of women in the public administration system: a comparative analysis of Kazakhstan and China

2026

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52123/1994-2370-2026-1814
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

The article is devoted to the professional trajectories of women in politics and public administration. The empirical basis of the study was made up of semi-structured interviews with 20 informants from Kazakhstan with experience in central and local government, the Presidential Administration, electoral authorities, the state audit system, deputies and the civil sector, as well as with 10 Kazakhstani experts in the field of political science and gender policy. The comparative part included interviews with 8 experts from analytical centers and universities in China. During the thematic analysis, nine cross-cutting topics were identified: professional identity in managerial positions, career trajectories, formal and informal resources, combining professional and family roles, socialization and role models, behavioral adaptation, solidarity and competition, mentoring, as well as institutional mechanisms for women's participation in decision-making. A comparison of the Kazakh quota mechanism with the Chinese practice of systematic training and professional development of personnel shows that the sustainability of a women's career depends on a combination of several conditions: rules of representation, professional training, rotation, mentoring and the ability to maintain career continuity. Chinese interviews do not form a symmetrical national sample and are used primarily as comparative material.