Аннотация
Digital government reforms increasingly depend on whether public organizations can convert administrative data into reliable workforce decisions without weakening accountability. This study examines the early development of a human-centered digital human resource management (HRM) ecosystem in Kazakhstan’s civil service using four complementary sources: five focus groups, an anonymous survey of 12,562 civil servants, a foresight exercise, and a 2026 pilot involving seven public organizations. Because individual-level microdata are unavailable, the study is intentionally descriptive and exploratory. Reported survey percentages are converted into approximate counts, and the analysis uses transparent diagnostic measures for attitudes, AI exposure and demand, integration maturity, workload concentration, and scenario-based time savings. Robustness is assessed by varying the AI-readiness weights, distinguishing strict from conditional pilot passes, and evaluating bounded time-saving scenarios. Across the evidence, positive attitudes toward digitalization and interest in AI coexist with fragmented data, weak interoperability, uneven analytical capability, and concerns about trust and accountability. The pilot further indicates that process standardization, data integration, and shared-service redesign can generate operational improvements before higher-discretion AI is introduced. The study contributes a preliminary sequencing argument rather than a causal estimate: data and process integrity should precede analytics; analytics capability should precede higher-discretion AI; and human oversight should remain a governance condition throughout. The findings provide policy-relevant evidence for Kazakhstan and a testable framework for later validation in other public administrations.