Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in routine antenatal care: A retrospective analysis from western Kazakhstan

Preventive Medicine Reports, 2026

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.pmedr.2026.103631
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

Objectives To assess gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis and screening practices in routine antenatal care in Kazakhstan. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study used electronic medical records of pregnant women receiving antenatal care in public outpatient clinics in Aktobe and Uralsk, Kazakhstan, from August 2024 to May 2025. Data were extracted from the DamuMed electronic medical system. A total of 445 pregnant women were included, of whom 229 had at least one GDM risk factor. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to assess screening practices and factors associated with oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) performance at 24–28 weeks of gestation. Results Fasting plasma glucose levels of 5.1–6.9 mmol/L were identified in 22.02% of women, while 1.57% had levels ≥7.0 mmol/L. However, GDM was documented in only 1.12%. Overall, 51.46% of women had at least one GDM risk factor. Among these women, 27.07% underwent OGTT at 24–28 weeks of gestation and 12.66% received an endocrinology consultation. OGTT uptake was significantly associated with elevated fasting plasma glucose, obesity, and a history of fetal macrosomia ( p < 0.05). Conclusions GDM screening and diagnosis appeared suboptimal, suggesting potential underdiagnosis and gaps in implementing national recommendations. Strengthened screening and referral pathways are needed.