Emerging Digital Technologies for Monitoring and Rehabilitation Support in Chronic Dust-Induced Lung Diseases: A Scoping Review

2026

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/jpm16080407
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

Background/Objectives: Chronic dust-induced lung diseases, including pneumoconiosis and asbestosis, require long-term monitoring and individualized management. Conventional rehabilitation and follow-up often depend on in-person visits and may not provide continuous assessment outside clinical settings. This scoping review mapped evidence on digital technologies used to monitor patients, assess respiratory symptoms and functional status, and support rehabilitation follow-up in chronic dust-induced lung diseases. Methods: The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 29 June 2026 without language restrictions. Five eligible publications were included. Results: The evidence was grouped into three categories: wearable monitoring of activity and respiratory symptoms, analysis of data from a digital rehabilitation platform, and electronic medical record (EMR) analysis. Wearable sensors showed high performance in recognizing basic activity states and cough events under controlled conditions. Platform- and EMR-based approaches showed potential for using clinical and functional data to support patient stratification and monitoring. However, most studies were limited to early technical or algorithmic validation and did not assess long-term home use, patient adherence, integration into clinical workflows, or clinical and rehabilitation outcomes. Conclusions: Digital technologies may support objective monitoring and rehabilitation follow-up in chronic dust-induced lung diseases, but the evidence base remains small and clinically immature. Prospective studies in real-world settings should evaluate usability, external validity, workflow integration, and clinically meaningful outcomes.