Аннотация
The development of higher education in resource-limited academic environments depends not only on teaching capacity and institutional governance, but also on researchers’ access to scholarly information. Limited subscriptions, insufficient library budgets, and uneven digital infrastructure create barriers to research productivity and encourage the use of informal access channels, including shadow libraries. These practices reveal not only ethical dilemmas, but also deeper institutional challenges in managing research capacity. This study examines how researchers’ informal access practices reflect problems in managing higher education development in resource-limited academic environments. The study focuses on access to scientific literature as a key element of research support, institutional capacity, and academic development. An online survey was conducted among 450 researchers working in resource-limited academic environments and having experience with informal access channels. Respondents were grouped by region, academic status, and disciplinary affiliation. The questionnaire included items on access to scholarly literature, frequency of use of formal and informal sources, perceived fairness of the scholarly publishing system, ethical sensitivity, and justifications for informal access. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation analysis, Kruskal–Wallis tests, Mann–Whitney pairwise comparisons, and factor analysis. The findings show that informal access practices are associated with several management-related constraints: limited institutional access to legitimate resources, insufficient convenience and speed of formal access channels, perceived unfairness of the publishing system, and weak alignment between academic values and institutional support mechanisms. Information-access constraints were the most frequent explanation, reported by 67.2% of respondents, followed by pragmatic considerations, ethical fairness claims, perceived breach of academic expectations, and civil disobedience. STEM researchers demonstrated the highest frequency of informal access use, while humanities researchers more often emphasized ethical justifications. Significant regional differences indicate that access-management problems vary across academic environments. Informal access to scientific literature should be understood not only as an individual ethical choice, but also as a signal of institutional and systemic weaknesses in managing higher education development. The findings suggest that universities and policymakers in resource-limited environments should strengthen library infrastructure, develop open-access strategies, support inter-institutional resource sharing, and provide ethical guidance for researchers. Effective management of scholarly information access is therefore an important condition for sustainable higher education development.