Improved prediction of crater size with ANN: A comparative study with PFE% models

2026

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2025.09.035
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

The Electro-discharge Machining (EDM) is a thermoelectric method in which material is removed from electrically conductive material by a series of rapid sparks between the workpiece and tool. Due to the non-contact process, it is suitable for brittle, hard, or complex-shaped materials. Modelling the EDM process numerically to obtain a single crater becomes complex due to many factors involved during machining, such as capacitance, voltage, flushing pressure, tool speed, and environment. Previously, a research effort has been made to develop the Plasma Flushing Efficiency (PFE%) to model the crater size. The inclusion of PFE% in the model has improved the accuracy of the prediction. Even though the model gave valuable insight, still the predictive accuracy remained limited. The current study presents the extension of previous research on the numerical modeling and simulation of micro-EDM for the prediction of crater size. The primary aim of the present work is to integrate an ANN for crater size prediction based on key process parameters, capacitance, and voltage. The model is developed by the grid search method to identify the optimal combination of activation function and neurons. The model with optimal hyperparameters showed higher predictive accuracy with R 2 > 99% for test and train data. Moreover, the models demonstrated significantly improved accuracy, with prediction errors falling below 1% for most data points, and a maximum error of ~5% occurred in a single instance, even with the limited data set.