Assessment of the technological potential of wheat varieties using mathematical models based on structural indicators

The Journal of Almaty Technological University, 2025

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.48184/2304-568x-2025-4-68-77
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

This article examines over thirty indicators that characterize the physicochemical and technological properties of wheat varieties. These indicators exhibit specific interrelationships. Each individual grain has unique features that influence changes in the corresponding properties. The interconnection of various types of indicators was integrated using mathematical regression models, allowing for a methodological assessment of the potential based on the grain, flour, dough, and bread, as well as enabling comparative evaluation of their quality level. The practical significance of this approach is substantial. It enables the technological evaluation of wheat varieties and their ranking based on quality indicators. The technological potential of domestic wheat varieties was calculated individually based on grain, flour, dough, and bread characteristics, allowing for a comprehensive quality assessment of each variety. The highest technological potential was found in the soft spring wheat variety Almeken — 3.699, while the lowest was observed in Kazakhstanskaya 10 — 2.025. To identify the relationships between physical, biochemical, milling, and baking properties of different wheat varieties, multiple correlation coefficients were calculated. Fisher’s and Student’s coefficients were also used as indicators of mutual influence. All calculations were performed using the R-Studio software.