Comparative genomic profiling of primary tumor tissue and circulating tumor DNA in Colorectal Cancer

2025

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.11134/btp.3s.2025.26
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

Background: Genomic profiling of tumor tissue is an effective approach for detecting mutations, single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), copy number variations (CNVs), and gene fusions that contribute to cancer progression. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has recently emerged as a minimally invasive alternative for the early detection and monitoring of cancer. However, its accuracy compared to tumor tissue sequencing remains to be investigated. The present study aimed to compare the mutational profiles of colorectal cancer (CRC) tumor tissue and ctDNA. Materials and Methods: Three CRC samples from KazIOR were analyzed. Biological material included paraffin-embedded tumor blocks and ctDNA isolated from blood plasma. DNA was extracted using the ReliaPrep™ FFPE gDNA Miniprep System and QIAamp MinElute ccfDNA Kits. Library preparation was performed using the Illumina TruSight Oncology 500 High- Throughput kit, and the quality of cfDNA was evaluated by spectrophotometric and fluorometric methods. Results: In sample BR115, the PGR mutation (NM_000926.4:c.2657A>G) was detected in both tumor tissue and ctDNA. Additional pathogenic variants in PMS2, CDKN2A, KRAS, and TP53 were identified in tumor tissue but were absent in ctDNA. In sample BR121, metastatic disease was confirmed, with KRAS and IRS2 mutations found in both tumor and ctDNA. Notably, a somatic pathogenic mutation in IRS2 (NM_000038.5:c.994C>T) was identified only in ctDNA, not in tumor tissue. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that ctDNA can mirror tumor mutational profiles and occasionally reveal additional variants undetectable in tissue, underscoring its potential as a non- invasive biomarker for early CRC detection and real-time disease monitoring. Unique mutational patterns also support the use of ctDNA for personalized treatment strategies. Key words: Colorectal cancer (CRC); solid tumors (ST); cell-free DNA (cfDNA) References: 2024 WHO. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Globocan 2024. Lyon, France: IARC. (2024) Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Tebbutt NC, Simes RJ, Chalchal H, Shapiro JD, Robitaille S, et al. K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1757–1765. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804385. Acknowledgements: Study was supported by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. АР23489913, АР22788205, BR24992841, BR24993023)