Leveraging Multimodal Large Language Models for Digital Forensics in Military Personnel Detection in Mobile Device Images

2025

Закрытый доступ Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/snpd65828.2025.11253944
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

Digital forensics plays a crucial role in modern investigations, particularly in analyzing vast amounts of image data from mobile devices to identify individuals, objects, and activities of interest. Traditional forensic techniques struggle with the complexity of real-world images, especially in distinguishing between military personnel and mannequins dressed in military attire. Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs), offer new opportunities for automating and enhancing forensic image analysis.This study evaluates the feasibility of using multimodal LLMs for detecting and recognizing military personnel in mobile device images. We compare the performance of Google’s Gemini 1.5 Pro, the open-source LLAVA model, and the newly released GPT-4o, analyzing their ability to identify military personnel and correctly classify attributes such as country and unit name. The dataset includes 436 images, comprising military personnel, military-themed mannequins, and civilians, to test the robustness of these models in real-world forensic scenarios.Our results show that all models achieved perfect precision (1.0) in detecting military presence, with high recall scores: 0.99 for Gemini, 0.98 for LLAVA, and 0.91 for GPT-4o. GPT-4o demonstrated a strong overall performance, with an accuracy of 0.751, placing it between Gemini (0.837) and LLAVA (0.69). However, contextual classification remains challenging. GPT-4o showed lower performance in country identification (0.385) compared to Gemini (0.787) but outperformed LLAVA (0.121). In unit name recognition, GPT-4o achieved 0.08, higher than LLAVA (0.005) but significantly lower than Gemini (0.254). All models struggled to distinguish mannequins from real military personnel, with high misclassification rates: 88 out of 99 mannequins were misclassified by Gemini, 86 by LLAVA, and comparable figures for GPT-4o.These findings highlight both the promise and current limitations of multimodal LLMs in forensic image analysis. While AI models can significantly assist forensic analysts in triaging large datasets and identifying relevant images, further research is needed to improve robustness against misclassification errors and enhance contextual understanding. This study provides valuable insights into the adoption of AI in digital forensics and lays the groundwork for future advancements in LLM-based forensic investigation techniques.