Comparative Research into Kazakhstan and American Master’s Students’ Motivation for Learning English Academic Writing (EFL/ESL)

2025

Полный текст Открытый доступ: Gold Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.15503/jecs2025.3.517.537
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

Aim. is to conduct theoretical-empirical research into Kazakhstan and American Master’s students’ motivation for learning English academic writing (EFL/ESL) with regard to cross-cultural components and sexual differentiation. Methods. The research involved 60 Master’s students (28 males and 32 females), pursuing a degree at Shakarim University (SU) (Semey, Kazakhstan) and 45 Master’s students (22 males and 23 females), pursuing a degree at the University of Illinois (UIUC) (Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA) aged 23 to 30. All the respondents were learning English academic writing (EFL/ESL). The research methods are as follows: “Diagnostics of Master’s Students’ Motivation to Study” Natalia Badmayeva (2004); “Motivation for Professional Activity” (Rean et al., 2006); “Diagnostics of the Individual’s Motivation Structure” Vitaliy Milman (1990). Results. No difference was found between the Kazakhstan and American samples in cross-cultural aspects. A high level of the prestige motive (t = 1.943; p = .027; d = .401) was identified in the Kazakhstan male sample, which was the only superiority by sexual differentiation. Psychological correlations between the parameters of motivation for learning English academic writing and the parameters of professional motivation were established. Seventeen significant correlations were recorded: one direct correlation and sixteen inverse correlations. It was explained that the parameters of Master’s students’ learning motivation are stimuli of a conscious and purposeful desire to study and develop themselves. It was highlighted that such stimuli focus on the resultant and content components of the educational process. Conclusions. Master’s students at both Universities of the examined samples prefer communication motive, social motive, prestige motive, learning-cognitive motive and comfort in learning English writing. The research findings should be implemented in the educational process at universities.